Which term describes the rationale for enforcing safety regulations based on ethical considerations?

The term that describes the rationale for enforcing safety regulations based on ethical considerations is the moral argument. This concept emphasizes that it is not only a legal obligation but also an ethical responsibility to protect the health and safety of workers. The moral argument suggests that organizations have a duty to provide a safe working environment because it is the right thing to do, valuing human life and well-being over profits or compliance alone.

This approach transcends legal compliance, which focuses primarily on meeting legislative requirements rather than considering the broader implications of workplace safety on employees’ lives. Financial justification centers on the economic benefits or cost savings of implementing safety measures, which does not inherently address the ethical aspect of protecting individuals. Regulatory pressure refers to the influence of external rules that compel organizations to act but does not necessarily stem from a moral standpoint.

By understanding the moral argument, organizations can cultivate a culture that prioritizes worker safety, ensuring that ethical considerations inform their policies and practices, ultimately leading to improved safety outcomes and a more positive workplace environment.