What is one consequence of a breach of duty?

A breach of duty occurs when an individual or organization fails to meet the standard of care that is expected in a particular situation, which can lead to various negative outcomes. When a breach of duty happens, one significant consequence is that the claimant—often an individual who has been affected by this breach—may suffer harm. This harm can manifest in various ways, including physical injury, psychological distress, or economic loss, depending on the context of the breach.

In legal terms, to successfully claim damages due to a breach of duty, the claimant must generally show that the breach directly led to the harm they suffered. This concept is central to tort law, where proving the connection between the breach and the resultant harm is pivotal for establishing liability.

While it is possible for no legal action to be taken or for compensation to be uncertain in certain circumstances, these do not directly address the immediate consequence of the breach in terms of actual harm to an individual. Similarly, the notion that duties are absolved contradicts the ongoing responsibilities that exist within the legal framework, particularly when a breach has indeed occurred. Guarantees of compensation are also not a universal truth, as damages can be contested or limited based on numerous factors. Hence, identifying that the claimant may suffer harm highlights the